Arguments against gay marriage debunked

What follows are 10 key myths propagated by the anti-gay movement, along with the truth behind the propaganda.

Gay men molest children at far higher rates than heterosexuals. Tired of rehashing the same arguments about marriage equality over and over? So was Wayne State University Philosophy Department Chair John Corvino, who put together this handy and surprisingly hilarious series of videos tackling every major argument against same-sex marriage out there.

Same-sex marriage advocates argue that it is wrong to make value judgments about marriage. Yet they allow themselves to make value judgments about who should get to marry. Claim 1: Jesus didn’t speak about same-sex marriage, so he’s at least neutral if not open to it. What Jesus doesn’t condemn, we shouldn’t condemn. This is an argument from silence, but the silence doesn’t take place in a vacuum.

Jeff Dee debunks the top 5 arguments against gay marriage. Why is this an atheist issue? Most of the arguments against gay marriage have a religious origin. That in turn conveys the impression that all modes of sexual expression seem equivalent. While it is true that many reputable studies have shown two-parent families tend to be most beneficial, the gender of the parents has never been shown to matter.

This hinges on the idea that gender roles are or should be fixed, as dictated by scripture, most often cited for the sake of healthy child development. They have obligations to protect minorities, even against majority opinion. In fact the recent government proposals are only for the legalisation of civil same-sex marriage, and do not allow for ceremonies to be conducted on religious sites.

Should women have compromised their right to vote? The Council ruled that a refusal of same-sex marriage does not violate the French constitution. Same-sex parents are simply presumed by biased researchers to be equivalent to single parents and step-parents, and therefore use the data interchangeably, which as anyone with an ounce of scientific literacy knows is not the way such studies work. Those who are most harmed by that are the children who no longer have a right to both a father and a mother, and their biological connectedness to a father no longer has any status in the law.

The State supports marriage because children may result from it. Is it too much to wish for politicians who can multi-task? Posted 19 May 19 May Thu 19 May at pm.

Reasons why same-sex marriage should be legalized essay

Marriage is not unjust In respect of the argument around ending discrimination, it is wrong and misleading to depict the case for same-sex marriage as a case for ending discrimination or for equal legal recognition of relationships. There is thus value for children in promoting strong, stable marriages between biological parents In his view civil partnerships are too much like getting a driving licence and deserve a sense of dignity and occasion.

By contrast, two men or two women cannot achieve the same kind of union, since there is no child-oriented outcome or function toward which their bodies can coordinate. Get our magazine. The Suffragettes famously marched together because they needed an excuse to compare clothing. But, as everyone should know, passion and reason are complementary. That marriage has come under stress from a variety of causes over the past 50 years, no fault divorce included, is no reason for radically altering its core nature, its aspirational value to society that it is the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life.

Civil rights activists looked fabulous with hoses and guns turned on them. It's just a waste of time in the heterosexual world, and in the homosexual world I find it personally beyond tragic that we want to ape this institution that is so clearly a disaster. Correction: A quote by Fiona O'Reilly has been removed that implied that the Catholic Church for England and Wales accepted the passing of the law on civil partnerships, which, in fact, the church opposed.

There are some who argue that the difference between marriage and civil partnerships is primarily a semantic one. As rising sea levels imperil small island nations, what will become of the citizenship status of those forced to flee? In June , the European Court ruled that the region's human rights convention "did not oblige a State to grant a same-sex couple access to marriage" as marriage has "deep-rooted social and cultural connotations.

The article suggests that in the interest of focusing on the most important concerns about gay marriage, commentators should move on to other arguments against it that seem stronger and thus better test the affirmative case for gay marriage. The law determines who are a child's parents in circumstances in which reproductive technology has created ambiguity by separating reproduction from the biological relationship between a man and a woman.

In other words, this ruling acknowledges that no one is disadvantaged when a society retains a distinctive name for these lifelong, faithful, exclusive and potentially procreative relationships between men and women which are oriented towards securing cognitively and spiritually the biological relationship that may result in the bearing and nurturing of children.